Recently, I attended a webinar sponsored by Private Equity CXO. The topic of the webinar was PE Strategy for Revenue Growth; CROs and Value Creation. Presenting in the webinar were several Private Equity professionals sharing their insights on the impact that having the right Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) can have on an organization’s success.
Let me first say that the webinar overall reinforced my personal experiences and beliefs throughout my career as both a GTM consultant and a CRO with experience working with companies ranging in size from $50M to >$6B in annual revenue. However, the webinar got me thinking about the challenges involved in finding the right CRO, the process that most private equity firms use to recruit CROs, and the end result…disappointingly low success rates as supported by comments in the webinar as well as in other datapoints I’ll present shortly.
While I could write pages summarizing the content of this webinar relating to how CROs should, or could create value, I will instead focus on one critical topic discussed by the group…finding the right CRO.
Herb Brooks, the famous coach of the United States 1980’s Men’s Gold Medal Olympic Hockey team, has one of the best all-time quotes and probably my personal favorite. As he was assembling his team, he was asked why he didn’t choose this player or that player because “they were the best”. Herb confidently, and with unwavering conviction replied, “I’m not looking for the best players, I’m looking for the right players.” This philosophy will serve as my anchor for why the right CRO may look quite different from the best CRO.
I believe Coach Brooks could not have been more spot-on. While I’m sure this comment will strike a chord with some, I stand by the belief that skill is much easier to teach than attitude, let alone chemistry, as it relates to team dynamics. A Harvard Business Review study showed that 44% of a company’s market value is attributable to its CEO’s reputation. This study further defines reputation as a combination of 3 key emotional intelligence characteristics including humility, visibility, and persuasiveness. One may conclude that some portion of a CEO’s reputation is a direct extension of the CEO’s executive and senior executive leadership team if you believe that a company’s culture is the sum of its parts.
Throughout the webinar the conversation often returned to the importance of the CRO’s team building capabilities, and leadership skills required to build a sustainable high performing culture.
From an operator point of view, I would say that while a new (and even existing) CRO certainly has the responsibility to lead and effect change in an organization, a new CRO especially needs to understand the existing culture that he/she is walking into, the runway in front of this them (timing expectations), and as mentioned in the webinar, a list of the “jobs to be done” – the critical items that must be completed within the next 12 months. Measure twice, cut once, applies to walking into a new role for both sides of the relationship – CRO and private equity partners. The greater clarity provided at the onset, the greater the likelihood of success and perhaps fewer missed expectations.
I strongly believe that the “right” CRO has both a track record of successes and failures. I’m always leery when I speak to any executive-level candidate who positions themselves as having made perfect decisions. Perhaps I’ve been blessed to work for leaders like Scott Cook of Intuit, who famously pushed our management team to make more mistakes – fail fast – as a barometer for the speed of innovation. If you’re not pushing boundaries, you’re not growing, you’re not evolving, you’re simply presiding over something that’s fairly vanilla, and hence replaceable. Basic, or as I like to call them, cut-and-pasted tactics might work when the waters are smooth, but absolutely go out the window when faced with gale force winds that may include a tight job market, raging inflation, or a pandemic that shifted the norm on how we get things done in business.
A status quo leader, not battle-tested by building and failing, decreases your probability of success and produces a lesser amount of value creation. It’s just as important to know what not to do, then knowing what the right thing to do is, as both include countless variables, known and unknown.
Case studies or homework assignments are great, but here’s where I slightly divert from the consensus shared on the webinar. In my own personal experience, focusing on the difficult questions to ask during an interview, combined with an Up-Down-Sideways reference check is another way to gauge the probability of success. Some folks have a talent to write, research, and/or problem solve in a controlled environment, but rarely do we operate in controlled environments, and case studies and homework assignments are just that…controlled environments.
In fact, I’d suggest that many sales leaders would have failed the case study in 2008-2009 during the GFC, or during the COVID pandemic. The test of a strong leader lies in his/her ability to consume information quickly and being comfortable with operating in ambiguity. According to Zippia, the average age of a Chief Revenue Officer is 49 years old. When combined with a datapoint from Salesforce indicating the average tenure of a CRO is right at 2 years, you begin to understand why the concept of battle-testing is so important over a variety of different environmental factors relative to creating and sustaining high performing teams. One could argue that even as case studies and homework assignments have become the norm for recruiting CROs, the success rates are discouragingly low at less than 2 years. Why is that? Here I’d suggest that what’s often missed is the softer, and perhaps more difficult skills to assess that include EQ (some of the items from the HBR study), charisma, and empathy, all of which are critical leadership qualities to establishing and maintaining high performing teams.
As Stephen Covey famously said, “people don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.” A leader showing up as the smartest person in the room likely will result in a team that tries to distance itself rather than embrace. Hence why EQ is so important when selecting a new CRO. And, with the average tenure of a CRO being 2 years, one possible conclusion that might be drawn is that too many know-it-alls show up day one on the job versus showing up with a learners mindset.
Of course, the right mix between EQ and IQ is critical. And while I referenced the criticality of some of the softer skills above, I also want to be clear that an effective CRO must have the passion and capability to deliver tangible tools to the teams they lead. I have written countless playbooks, personas, and ICPs for the teams I’ve led throughout my career as a CRO. I study data, identify trends, create hypos to prove/disprove. I spend a great deal of time in the field with sales professionals running these plays and adjusting them accordingly, perhaps another carry-over from my experience at Intuit with Noel Tichy’s famous “teach, learn, teach” model underpinned our day-to-day operating rhythm in the business.
Often, I see CROs rely much too heavily on outside consultants (I was one of those), to do this type of work. Why? Because they either are not close enough to the business to know, or in the worst cases feel that the level of in-the-weeds work is beneath them. This, however, is exactly the work that moves the needle by building sales effectiveness, team spirit, and a high performing culture where teams recognize that their Sales leader is sleeves-rolled-up, capable, competent, and credible.
It was mentioned several times during the webinar private equity’s desire for predictability. Delivering a “flash-in-a-pan” result is easier than producing consistent results over time. Again, this is why it’s critical to be clear about what is required within the first 12-month period and what resources are available to accomplish those requirements. The resource discussion is yet another topic that is deserving of its own thought leadership piece. For now, here’s a simple way to illustrate the importance of having the right resources…
As someone raised in a musical family, and having played drums for many years, I consider Neil Peart to be arguably the best drummer of all time. So, was it the 54-piece drum kit that made Neil sound so incredible? Or was Neil’s raw talent such that he’d sound good no matter how many drums he had at his disposal? While I’d seen Peart amaze enthusiasts on a regular 4-piece Jazz set, the sounds and complex rhythms he played on 54 pieces simply amped things up a notch. He had the resources to transcend being great to being the greatest. Now, drop in Phil Collins behind Peart’s 54 pieces. Would Collins, another great, sound equally impressive? Or does it suggest that resourcing wouldn’t matter, and that Collins would just “know” how to play, what to play, and when to play it? As a reference point, Phil’s typical set is (was) a 10-piece kit. Regardless, it’s clear that talent, plus resourcing, equals output. The key to success is understanding what that specific talent requires, relative to resourcing, to produce the expected or desired results.
Back to the CRO thing, a CRO must also have the ability to look at data and make inferences…quick assessments of a situation. Deductions usually come when deeper analysis is done, and oftentimes, the ability to do a deep dive is limited by a company’s systems, platforms, access to the data itself (perhaps it’s never been captured historically), or not having the analysts (talent) available to do such work. This leaves the CRO in the position of either taking no action as they become paralyzed by fear of making the wrong decision, or the opposite extreme, making knee-jerk decisions as they quickly fire from the hip. This area of CRO skill must also be contemplated when thinking about culture, timeframes, and expectations.
Finally, the relationship the CRO has with his/her owners/investors cannot be underestimated relative to performance. Are the company’s owner enthusiastic supporters? Are they impatient investors who have gone through a series of failed CROs leading them to bring high levels of doubt or skepticism into any new relationship? Does the CRO have solid chemistry with both the CEO and CFO? It has always struck me as odd that I’ve personally never interviewed with a CFO while being recruited for the top Sales chair, yet my personal relationship with a CFO, as a CRO, is perhaps equally important if not more important than the relationship between a CEO and CRO. There’s a ton there to unpack as a topic – the relationship between CRO and CFO – that opens the door for future thought leadership content.
In summary, finding the right CRO begins with an accurate assessment of the future of the asset. Where are we in the hold period? What has the last 3-5 years of organic growth looked like for the company? What’s the tenure of the team? Is it a complete build, or rebuild? Is there a VP of Rev Ops in place, and further, how strong is that person relative to all aspects of analysis and GTM tech platforms? Do any of the CROs previously-built-teams still exist? Can the CRO demonstrate an example where he/she groomed and promoted their replacement, and where and how is that replacement fairing today? With the average age of a CRO being 49, what was he/she doing during the dotcom bust, the GFC, the pandemic, and most recently our current period of high inflation and stifling borrowing rates? Can the CRO candidate comfortably articulate key learnings from each of these periods and demonstrate how those learnings enabled them to better navigate through the subsequent challenges or crises? What tangible examples can the CRO point to as evidence of something they built new, as a response to their own evolution of thought due to their experiences?
In choosing the right Chief Revenue Officer, it’s essential to recognize that leadership is not just about past successes, but about the ability to adapt, evolve, and thrive in an ever-changing business landscape. The true measure of a CRO lies in their capacity to turn challenges into opportunities, ensuring that their experiences become the cornerstone for future growth and innovation.